Location >

Page 2 of 3
Previous


The Onboard Galileo Rubidium and Passive Maser, Status & Performance


Figure 9. PHM EM frequency and time stabilities


  • Teflonization of the quartz storage Bulb
  • Hydrogen beam assembly
  • Getters assembly
  • Tuning of the microwave cavity
  • H2 purifier assembly
  • Magnetic shield assembly
  • State selector assembly
  • Hydrogen supply and dissociator
Fig. 10 shows the atomic response of the PHM physics package, measured with 15Hz span exhibiting atomic signal gain of 3.8dB and atomic line width of 2 Hz.

The new design of the physics package has been also focussed on parts count reduction. Less than one half individual parts has been used in the new design compared to the EM model.

For the electronics package and the whole instrument:

  • Reduction of PHM volume and footprint
  • Improvement of TM/TC interface
  • Ground operability at ambient pressure
  • Redesign of hydrogen dissociator
  • Improvement of thermal and pressure controls
  • Redesign of PHM and Purifier supply

Figure 10. PHM atomic signal measured in FM1



Figure 11. Technological models with/without cover


Two technological models (Fig. 11), a Structural Model and an EQM were built for these objectives and to qualify the new upgraded design. In addition, four EQMs for life demonstration are being manufactured and will be submitted to prolonged testing. In the frame of GSTB-V2, which is presently being tested at P/L level, one PFM (Fig. 12) has completed the proto-qualification testing and has been delivered. One spare FM will be delivered by the end of 2005. Table II shows the achieved performance of PHM/PFM for GSTBV2. Significant improvement has been achieved by a better silver coating process and surface polishing of the magnetron cavity (Fig 13). Fig. 14 is showing the performances improvements of the physics package of FM1 model before its integration, obtained by the quality factor improvement.


Figure 12. Picture of PHM PFM


TABLE II. PHM FOR GSTB-V2 PERFORMANCE ACHIEVED
Parameter Measurement
Frequency stability < 1*10-14 @ 10’000 sec
Flicker floor < 7*10-15
Thermal sensitivity < 3*10-14 /°C
Magnetic sensitivity < 4*10-14 / Gauss
Mass and volume 18 kg and 28 liter



Figure 13. PHM magnetron cavity



Figure 14. PHM performance improvement


PHM Lifetime
The PHM is being sized to guarantee 12 years of orbit life plus 1 year of ground storage, as well as the complete AIT program. The operational life is mainly limited by capacities of the hydrogen container (for H2 supply), bulk getters (for H2 sorption), ion pump (for pumping ungetterable background gases) and the total dose of ionising radiation. The lifetime is assessed by analysis and tests of subassemblies.

Fig. 15 shows the H2 consumption test made in June 2005, which indicates the consumption of 1.53 bar*l/year at nominal flux, by measuring the pressure decay in the known volume of the high pressure pipeline. Taking account of the margin from the real consumption and the retrievable H2 amount in the fixed pressure of the metal hydride, the H2 container with the capacity of 30 bar*l is sufficient for the operational life time.

A novel custom built getter pump is developed for the PHM. The getter material provides high sorption capability and mechanical stability. The H2 sorption test on the getter cartridge was performed in Sep 2003. Fig. 16 shows several cycles of the H2 filling and pumping during the test. It has demonstrated that the getter pump is capable of sorbing the required amount of H2 of 20 bar*l without embrittlement and the base pressure after the sorption was in the low 10-7 mbar range with only the getter cartridge pumping.

For the ion pump, the operating life at 5*10-6mbar is specified 8000 hours, corresponding to 400'000 hours (45 years) at the nominal high vacuum of 10-7 mbar. Moreover, accelerated lifetime tests of the pump in a gas composition as close to the PHM situation as possible will be performed to assure the pump life.

The total dose of ionising radiation over the mission lifetime on board of the Galileo Spacecraft was analysed on the PHM physics package and electronics package, respectively by the approach of ‘sector’. The radiation test will be performed.


Figure 15. H2 consumption test



Figure 16. H2 sorption test


In order to gain more field data on the reliability and lifetime of PP subassemblies four EQMs will be produced dedicated to the lifetime. The objective of the lifetime test is to monitor, during the scheduled two years, the critical parameters drift or degradation in order to predict the lifetime of the instrument and identify possible correction areas.

III. CONCLUSIONS
Table III summarizes the Galileo clocks status up to now. Both clocks are subjected to electrical (functional, thermal vacuum, EMC, etc.), as well as, mechanical tests (shock and vibrations). Nine flight models are being produced for GSTB-V2, which will provide the first flight opportunity for Galileo clocks qualification. With more than 10 years of efforts, two clock technologies for Galileo are qualified. Those clocks use reliable and mature technologies leaving room from further improvements in term of mass & performances.

TABLE III. GALILEO CLOCKS STATUS
Steps RAFS PHM
BB Completed in 1995 BB activity and EM design started in 2000
EM Completed in 2000Completed in Q1/2003 (under life test since June 2003)
EQM 5 models built and under lifetime tests4 models available in 2006 for lifetime tests
QM1 model (RAFS1) fully qualified Rad. test Q1/20031 model
EQM for GSTB-V21 model delivered in August 20041 model completed in February 2005
FM for GSTB-V26 models (4 delivered, 2 by Q3 /2005)1 model delivered, 1 model by Q4 /2005 as spare.


REFERENCES

  1. A. Jeanmaire, P. Rochat, F. Emma, “Rubidium atomic clock for Galileo,” 31st Precise Time and Time Interval (PTTI) Meeting, 07- 09 December, 1999, California (USA), pp. 627-636.
  2. F. Droz, P. Rochat, G. Barmaverain, M. Brunet, J. Delporte, J. Dutrey, F. Emma, T. Pike, and U. Schmidt, “On-Board Galileo RAFS, current status and Performances,” 2003 IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium Jointly with the 17th European Frequency and Time Forum, 05-08 May, 2003, Tampa (USA), pp. 105-108.
  3. P. Berthoud, I. Pavlenko, Q. Wang, and H. Schweda, “The engineering model of the space passive hydrogen maser for the European global navigation satellite system GalileoSat,” 2003 IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium Jointly with the 17th European Frequency and Time Forum, 05-08 May, 2003, Tampa (USA), pp. 90-94.
  4. L. Mattioni, M. Belloni, P. Berthoud, I. Pavlenko, H. Schweda, Q. Wang, P. Rochat, F. Droz, P. Mosset, and H. Ruedin, “The development of a passive hydrogen maser clock for Galileo navigation system,” 34th Precise Time and Time Interval (PTTI) Meeting, 03-05 December, 2002, Reston (USA), pp. 161-170.

Page 2 of 3
Previous